Math Infinitum
Mapping the lesson.
Loading the workspace…
Topology · Lesson 01
To cover a space is to choose open sets that between them leave nothing out. Compactness asks whether any such choice, however large, can be cut down to finitely many that still cover.
Read freely. Sign in when you want to save your place.
Sign in to save progressTo cover a space is to choose open sets that between them leave nothing out. Compactness asks whether any such choice, however large, can be cut down to finitely many that still cover.
A hall lit by a great many lamps. The question is not whether few lamps could have been installed, but whether some finite handful of the ones present already lights the whole hall.
To cover a space is to choose open sets that between them leave nothing out; three of the chosen sets are drawn, and the rest of the cover is not. Compactness asks whether every such choice, however lavish, already holds finitely many that cover — a demand about all covers, which is why proving it is so much harder than denying it.
A family of open sets whose union is the whole of is an open cover. A subcover is a subfamily of that same family which still covers. The space is compact when every open cover has a finite subcover. Read the order of the words carefully: the demand is not that some finite cover exists, but that any cover at all can be thinned to a finite one.
Take any open cover of a space with finitely many points. Covering means every point lies in at least one member, so go through the points one at a time and pick, for each, a single member containing it. That is one choice per point and there are finitely many points, so finitely many members have been picked. They already cover, because every point is in the one picked for it. The cover was arbitrary, so every cover thins, which is the definition.
The space has finitely many points; list them.
A cover reaches every point, so for each point one member containing it can be chosen.
Those members already cover, since every point lies in the one chosen for it.
An arbitrary cover has been thinned to finitely many members, which is what compactness demands.
Arbitrary on the left, finite on the right, and drawn from the same family.
Try it
What does compactness demand?
A subfamily, not a replacement.
Try it
Given a cover of , you produce a different finite family of open sets covering . Does that show is compact?
Infinitely many members, and a perfectly ordinary cover.
Try it
May an open cover have infinitely many members?
One member chosen for each of the points.
Try it
Why is a space with finitely many points compact?
Try it
What does it mean to call a subset compact?